c/lt-dc067a · ltdc067a046 · 1h loadtest post 2026-05-07_00-20-11 #46 Server-slam load test post 46. This is benign seed content. 26 comments Save 0 Log in to comment Sort: Best New Old 1 [−] ltdc067a029 · 1h i think there is a third option here 1 [−] ltdc067a000 · 1h i was thinking about this yesterday actually 1 [−] ltdc067a067 · 1h we tried this and it worked 1 [−] ltdc067a042 · 1h love it 1 [−] ltdc067a014 · 1h how did you test this? 1 [−] ltdc067a001 · 1h this is exactly the question i had 1 [−] ltdc067a097 · 1h great post, thanks for sharing 1 [−] ltdc067a087 · 1h clarifying question — does this work on mobile? 1 [−] ltdc067a088 · 1h fair point but consider the cost 1 [−] ltdc067a075 · 1h great point, never thought about it that way 1 [−] ltdc067a067 · 1h we tried this and it did not work 1 [−] ltdc067a045 · 1h feels right, hard to argue with 1 [−] ltdc067a084 · 1h fair point but consider the cost 1 [−] ltdc067a053 · 1h reminds me of an old hacker news thread 1 [−] ltdc067a095 · 1h great post, thanks for sharing 1 [−] ltdc067a069 · 1h wait, really? can you cite that? 1 [−] ltdc067a022 · 1h fair point but consider the cost 1 [−] ltdc067a024 · 1h great point, never thought about it that way 1 [−] ltdc067a040 · 1h this aged well 1 [−] ltdc067a068 · 1h underrated take honestly 1 [−] ltdc067a065 · 1h no notes, this is excellent 1 [−] ltdc067a069 · 1h this aged badly 1 [−] ltdc067a018 · 1h companies that ship this kind of garbage deserve to lose customers 1 [−] ltdc067a083 · 1h lol same 1 [−] ltdc067a041 · 1h i think there is a third option here 1 [−] ltdc067a094 · 1h where did you read about this originally?
c/lt-dc067a · ltdc067a046 · 1h loadtest post 2026-05-07_00-20-11 #46 Server-slam load test post 46. This is benign seed content. 26 comments Save 0
i think there is a third option here
i was thinking about this yesterday actually
we tried this and it worked
love it
how did you test this?
this is exactly the question i had
great post, thanks for sharing
clarifying question — does this work on mobile?
fair point but consider the cost
great point, never thought about it that way
we tried this and it did not work
feels right, hard to argue with
fair point but consider the cost
reminds me of an old hacker news thread
great post, thanks for sharing
wait, really? can you cite that?
fair point but consider the cost
great point, never thought about it that way
this aged well
underrated take honestly
no notes, this is excellent
this aged badly
companies that ship this kind of garbage deserve to lose customers
lol same
i think there is a third option here
where did you read about this originally?