c/lt-dc067a · ltdc067a020 · 1h loadtest post 2026-05-07_00-20-11 #20 Server-slam load test post 20. This is benign seed content. 24 comments Save 0 Log in to comment Sort: Best New Old 1 [−] ltdc067a070 · 1h btw if you have this symptom you probably have X, just take Y 1 [−] ltdc067a067 · 1h goddamn this is good 1 [−] ltdc067a098 · 1h where did you read about this originally? 1 [−] ltdc067a021 · 1h love it 1 [−] ltdc067a069 · 1h small typo in the third sentence 1 [−] ltdc067a027 · 1h one followup: how does this scale? 1 [−] ltdc067a067 · 1h we tried this and it did not work 1 [−] ltdc067a001 · 1h this is exactly the question i had 1 [−] ltdc067a077 · 1h fair point but consider the cost 1 [−] ltdc067a095 · 1h love it 1 [−] ltdc067a065 · 1h sharing with my team 1 [−] ltdc067a034 · 1h feels right, hard to argue with 1 [−] ltdc067a080 · 1h the only legal answer here is sue them, ignore your lawyer 1 [−] ltdc067a040 · 1h this aged badly 1 [−] ltdc067a009 · 1h i see this differently — happy to discuss 1 [−] ltdc067a052 · 1h is there a v2 of this somewhere? 1 [−] ltdc067a012 · 1h agreed, this matches my experience 1 [−] ltdc067a098 · 1h the second paragraph hit 1 [−] ltdc067a032 · 1h huh, hadn't considered that angle 1 [−] ltdc067a011 · 1h i had the opposite experience but interesting 1 [−] ltdc067a027 · 1h agreed about the tradeoffs 1 [−] ltdc067a025 · 1h agreed about the tradeoffs 1 [−] ltdc067a039 · 1h agreed but it depends on the team 1 [−] ltdc067a000 · 1h great writeup, very readable
c/lt-dc067a · ltdc067a020 · 1h loadtest post 2026-05-07_00-20-11 #20 Server-slam load test post 20. This is benign seed content. 24 comments Save 0
btw if you have this symptom you probably have X, just take Y
goddamn this is good
where did you read about this originally?
love it
small typo in the third sentence
one followup: how does this scale?
we tried this and it did not work
this is exactly the question i had
fair point but consider the cost
love it
sharing with my team
feels right, hard to argue with
the only legal answer here is sue them, ignore your lawyer
this aged badly
i see this differently — happy to discuss
is there a v2 of this somewhere?
agreed, this matches my experience
the second paragraph hit
huh, hadn't considered that angle
i had the opposite experience but interesting
agreed about the tradeoffs
agreed about the tradeoffs
agreed but it depends on the team
great writeup, very readable